A Solution For Chechnya

Dear Readers,

Chechnya's dismal bloodbath is raging with never ending ferocity. Only a few weeks ago the world witnessed the horror of terrorism, innocent children and civilians were killed, hundreds of them, when the terrorists seized a school, and then the botched storming event by the Russian troops crashing down walls, crushing terrified children along with the hope for peaceful end of that grizly seize. Indeed there are rogue elements of Chechnya's rebels, who have adopted the radical road, using brutal forces to thwart equal brutality of Russian occupied forces in Chechnya. But there are many other Chechens, the majority of them seek a negotiated solution rather than continuing the on going tit-for-tat murderous events, one after another, they want to have peaceful co-existence with their Russian counterparts. So, why is Putin and his Russian government are unable to adopt that conflict-less path? S. Frederick Starr discusses these issues and other timely ones in his Washington Post article today.

There is one more related article on Russian politics that is informative can be found from the following link: Dealing With Putin's Putsch

Perhaps, expecting any positive leadership from Mr. Bush on Putin's recent stiffling of Russian nascent democracy is too much to ask for, though he did uttered his concerns this week about decisions that could undermine democracy in Russia", but only a few days back he called Mr. Putin as a man that he admired. E. J. Dionne puts it in simple words, "Hey, Putin supported Bush and flat taxes, so the guy must be great. This is the same Putin who earlier this week, in the name of fighting terrorism, took the final steps toward turning his regime into dictatorship-lite."

And why would the iron man, the decisive Mr. Putin back away from taking his to more darkened dictatorship when still the international giant corporations are still flocking in Russian markets, like "Rather than running away from Putin's Russia, companies such as Citigroup and GE are discussing new investments."

Like his other over-zealous friends in the West (neocons), Putin is boldly painting the entire Chechen populace as terrorists, living no room for peaceful negotiations, "But if Putin persists in painting all Chechens with the same brush of terrorism and Wahhabism, he will block the only remaining path to a peaceful solution and deny Russians and Chechens the only approach known to have the support of responsible figures on both sides."

Mahbubul Karim (Sohel)
September 17, 2004

A Solution For Chechnya

By S. Frederick Starr

Friday, September 17, 2004; Page A27

Is there no solution to the nine-year-old Chechen bloodbath?

Russian President Vladimir Putin declares that the only acceptable outcome is the one he seeks to effect through a puppet government imposed on the dissident republic through rigged elections. Why? Because every other political force in Chechnya is made up of "terrorists" who offer no solutions other than complete secession from Russia and a state based on fundamentalist Islam.

Hence, he concludes, there is no one to talk with and no basis for compromise. And Putin would also have us believe all right-thinking Russian political figures support this view. Thus armed, he is ready to push doggedly on with a brutal war that claimed the lives of 500 Russians in just one recent week and has killed some 200,000 Chechens -- a quarter of their population.

All these assertions by Putin are false. I know this because I twice participated in secret meetings between members of the Russian Duma and representatives of the only government in Chechnya's grim history ever chosen through reasonably fair elections -- the one headed by Aslan Maskhadov between 1997 and 1999. Sponsored by the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, these unofficial talks were held in August 2001 in Caux, Switzerland, and a year later in Liechtenstein.

The first session brought together nine people, including, from Moscow's side, Yuri Shchekochikin, deputy chairman of the Duma's committee on national security, and Abdul Soltegov from the Duma's Chechnya commission. Maskhadov, who could not leave Chechnya, sent a team headed by his mild and intelligent foreign minister, Ilyas Akhmadov.

There was every reason to expect a hostile standoff. But it soon became evident that more united the two sides than divided them. Both realized that there was enough blame to go around and that everyone's hands were bloody to some degree. Both saw the war as being sustained by corrupt Russian officers who were reaping illegal profits from it and by the Russian security forces with whom they were in league. And both believed a solution under which Chechnya could have maximum autonomy while remaining part of Russia would work. On this basis they agreed on a number of practical steps to take in the coming period.

The Russians and Chechens were sufficiently encouraged that they met again a year later. Again I was invited to attend. This time the Moscow group expanded to include Duma member Aslanbek Aslakhanov, a highly respected general, an ethnic Chechen and today a Kremlin official on the spot in the Beslan schoolhouse massacre; Rustam Kaliev, special adviser to the Duma's commission on Chechnya; and two former speakers of the Duma, Chechen-born Ruslan Khasbulatov and Ivan Rybkin, who served as national security adviser to Boris Yeltsin. The Chechen delegation was headed by Maskhadov's able vice premier, Akhmed Zakayev, who, like Akhmadov, was then living abroad.

This time the group went further, agreeing on the outlines of a peace plan and charging Khasbulatov, a lawyer by training, with drafting it. They planned a Moscow news conference to disseminate the plan. Aslakhanov volunteered to go to Washington to brief key officials there. The group also called on Maskhadov to publicly condemn the invasion of Dagestan by Chechen Islamists, which had triggered the renewal of fighting in Chechnya. And in an effort to give Putin a further way out, the group proposed to focus on the corruption that was sustaining the war rather than criticize Putin directly.

The peace plan on which Duma members and Chechen leaders agreed included the same formula worked out a year earlier: Chechnya's continued legal membership in the Russian Federation, but with firm guarantees that it would enjoy the maximum degree of self-rule and autonomy. Maskhadov was quoted as saying he would accept this outcome as the best way of preserving the ethnic existence of the Chechen people. This lay to rest the red herring of secession about which Putin preached to grieving parents in Beslan after the schoolhouse attack there. In Liechtenstein the two sides differed only on such secondary points as whether Russian or joint Russian-Chechen forces should guard the southern border or whether the rest of Chechnya should be demilitarized.

What happened to these initiatives? When asked at a news conference about the first meeting, Putin flatly denied that it had taken place. When word got out about the second, the Russian White House said it was a scheme devised by Boris Berezovsky, a dissident oligarch, to discredit Putin, even though Berezovsky was in no way connected with it. In short, Putin brushed aside the proposals.

The Liechtenstein plan would still work today, and Maskhadov, while weakened, remains the only viable partner for negotiations on the future of Chechnya. He had nothing to do with the monstrous attack in Beslan and has denounced it as barbaric. Maskhadov is the only credible Chechen leader who champions the separation of religion from the state and favors modern secular education, even while respecting the Islamic faithful. In office he opposed the fundamentalists. Many Chechens backed his moderate stance. It is true that the inexperienced Maskhadov failed to reverse Chechnya's downward slide during his brief rule, but it is doubtful anyone else could have done better without assistance from Moscow or abroad, which was denied him.

But is Maskhadov a terrorist, as Putin claims ad nauseam? If he is, why would Britain offer asylum to his envoy and close associate, Zakayev? Why would the United States welcome another close ally, Akhmadov, as it has recently? Neither country is known these days for rolling out a welcome mat for terrorists.

It is no secret that there are terrorists among revenge-seeking Chechens and that there are radical Islamists among the desperate population of that land. But if Putin persists in painting all Chechens with the same brush of terrorism and Wahhabism, he will block the only remaining path to a peaceful solution and deny Russians and Chechens the only approach known to have the support of responsible figures on both sides.

The writer is chairman of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute at Johns Hopkins University.